What We Look for in a First Meeting
Most founders over-prepare the deck and under-prepare the conversation. Here's what actually shapes our decision in a first meeting, and how to make the most of thirty minutes with a partner.
Most founders arrive at a first meeting with a polished deck and a rehearsed pitch. Both help, but neither decides the outcome. What we're really trying to understand in thirty minutes is simple: is this the right team for this problem, at this moment?
Clarity over polish
We'd rather hear a clear, honest explanation of the problem than a perfect slide. Can you describe who feels the pain, how they solve it today and why that's no longer good enough? If you can do that in two minutes, the rest of the conversation gets much better.
Speed of learning
At pre-seed and seed, very little is proven. What we look for instead is momentum in your thinking. What did you believe three months ago that you no longer believe? Which customer conversation changed your roadmap? Founders who learn fast tend to build fast.
An earned insight
The strongest teams know something the market hasn't caught up to yet, usually from years spent close to the problem. In financial services, that often means first-hand experience with the regulation, infrastructure or customers that outsiders underestimate.
We're not looking for certainty. We're looking for a sharp team that knows exactly what it needs to learn next.
How to prepare
Lead with the problem, not the product.
Bring one or two real customer stories.
Be clear about what you don't know yet.
Know what you'd do with the next twelve months of capital.
If the conversation leaves both sides curious, that's a great first meeting. Everything else can follow.
